linux-kernel - Re: Please revert 86c0baf123e474b6eb404798926ecf62b426bf3a

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0705080815480.3974@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 8 May 2007 08:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...il.nowhere.org>
Subject: Re: Please revert 86c0baf123e474b6eb404798926ecf62b426bf3a



On Tue, 8 May 2007, Russell King wrote:
> 
> Shall I invent __CPUINIT to mark data to always be thrown away, or are
> the x86 folk going to withdraw this patch and do it properly?

I can certainly revert the patch, but it would probably be better if you 
were to just start adding the infrastructure you need and send it as a new 
patch instead (where the revert is part of it, and the __CPUINIT is 
additional). 

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/