linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] LogFS proper

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 8 May 2007 22:15:18 +0300
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Jörn Engel" <joern@...ybastard.org>
Cc:	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Dave Kleikamp" <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"David Chinner" <dgc@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] LogFS proper

On 5/8/07, Jörn Engel <joern@...ybastard.org> wrote:
> > > +typedef __be16 be16;
> > > +typedef __be32 be32;
> > > +typedef __be64 be64;
> >
> > Why are those typedefs necessary ?
>
> Not strictly.  I tend to use the be* types fairly often in the code and
> simply grew weary of seeing the underscores.
>
> Any objections if I seperate out the userspace headers and keep the
> shorthands for kernel code only?

Not sure what you mean but I would prefer you drop the typedefs completely.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/