linux-kernel - Re: [bisect] NFS regression breaks X

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46424FC5.40804@garzik.org>
Date:	Wed, 09 May 2007 18:48:37 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Subject: Re: [bisect] NFS regression breaks X

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Can you try it with this patch that re-introduces the "total overkill" 
> slack calculations, and probably makes them even worse (there's a few 
> left-shifts added, and now it will left-shift the extra slacktoo).

I'll try this patch, and separately, the Trond push that just appeared 
on LKML.

But after losing several hours discovering this "known issue," I need to 
attend to my own patches for today first.  So, testing won't be immediate.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/