linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] firewire: OHCI-1394 lowlevel driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46425BF0.8070401@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 09 May 2007 19:40:32 -0400
From:	Kristian Høgsberg <krh@...hat.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kristian H??gsberg <krh@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux1394-devel <linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] firewire: OHCI-1394 lowlevel driver

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> +	if (pci_enable_device(dev)) {
>> +		fw_error("Failed to enable OHCI hardware.\n");
>> +		return cleanup(ohci, CLEANUP_PUT_CARD, -ENODEV);
> 
> Please use normal goto unwinding so the driver follows the same model
> as almost all other pci drivers and allows people to follow your driver
> more easily.  Also it's not a alot of cleanup code, so removing this
> might actually be a net decrease in lines of code.

Sure.  The patch I have here says 42 insertions, 44 deletions :)

>> +	if (software_reset(ohci)) {
> 
> Please give all your function a nice prefix so that oops messages are
> more readable.

I don't see a strong precedence for this for static functions.  For example, 
if you grep for 'static' in drivers/usb/core, there's a mix of usb_* prefixed 
functions and functions without a consistent prefix.  Plus, when the drivers 
are loaded as modules, the module name will be in the stack trace.  I can 
track down the most generic sounding functions and give them a fw_ prefix, but 
doing a whole-sale prefixing of static functions will make the source more 
noisy and reduce readabilty - I'm not sure it's worth it.

cheers,
Kristian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/