[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46425195.9030501@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 00:56:21 +0200
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: Kristian Høgsberg <krh@...hat.com>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux1394-devel <linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] firewire: SBP-2 highlevel driver
Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> This mean we have to add all the LUs from the unit directory
> corresponding to the sbp2_device struct to that host. Is that
> a problem?
Most certainly not for now.
> I think we had this discussion before,
I believe that was on a different aspect of multi-LU targets.
> but I still don't understand why this approach isn't feasible.
I didn't say it was infeasible. On the contrary, I too wanted (am
wanting) to rework sbp2 so that it instantiates only a single
Scsi_Host globally or per FireWire initiator port. It's just one
of the things that I always pushed back, and where the devil is in
the detail. (Notably if multiple targets, not just multiple LUs
of one target, live beneath one Scsi_Host.)
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -=-= -=-=-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists