[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1178789346.5575.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 19:29:06 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add hard_irq_disable()
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 01:53 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 01:50:36 -0700
>
> > We discussed this a couple of months back. davem landed firmly in the
> > second camp and everyone then shut up ;)
>
> No I landed in the first :-)))
>
> I think the empty lines are a waste and only serve to eat
> up precious screen real-estate when reading code.
>
> It is possible that I used to use the empty line thing in
> the past, but I definitely don't do that any more.
Yup, I used to do the other one too but nowadays, I much prefer not
wasting that additional line unless specific circumstances, like I
want a kind of "title" in front of a whole block of other definitions
with their own comments.
Something like:
/*
* foo management stuff
*/
/* This puts the bar in the foo
*/
code code code code
/* This does something you don't want to know about
*/
code code code code
But does it realy matter that much ? :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists