[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1178794863.11271.20.camel@vader.jdub.homelinux.org>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 06:01:03 -0500
From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...b.homelinux.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add hard_irq_disable()
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 19:29 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 01:53 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 01:50:36 -0700
> >
> > > We discussed this a couple of months back. davem landed firmly in the
> > > second camp and everyone then shut up ;)
> >
> > No I landed in the first :-)))
> >
> > I think the empty lines are a waste and only serve to eat
> > up precious screen real-estate when reading code.
> >
> > It is possible that I used to use the empty line thing in
> > the past, but I definitely don't do that any more.
>
> Yup, I used to do the other one too but nowadays, I much prefer not
> wasting that additional line unless specific circumstances, like I
> want a kind of "title" in front of a whole block of other definitions
> with their own comments.
>
> Something like:
>
>
> /*
> * foo management stuff
> */
>
>
> /* This puts the bar in the foo
> */
> code code code code
>
> /* This does something you don't want to know about
> */
> code code code code
Now your examples are just wrong. One liners should be:
/* This puts the bar in the foo */
Are we having fun yet? ;)
/me goes to look for something better to do
josh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists