linux-kernel - Re: Chaining sg lists for big I/O commands: Question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 May 2007 20:41:05 +0200 (MEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
cc:	Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
	Alan Piszcz <ap@...arrain.com>
Subject: Re: Chaining sg lists for big I/O commands: Question

On May 9 2007 15:38, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> I am a mdadm/disk/hard drive fanatic, I was curious:
>> 
>> >On i386, we can at most fit 256 scatterlist elements into a page,
>> >and on x86-64 we are stuck with 128. So that puts us somewhere
>> >between 512kb and 1024kb for a single IO.
>> 
>> How come 32bit is 256 and 64 is only 128?
>>
>> I am sure it is something very fundamental/simple but I was curious, I 
>> would think x86_64 would fit/support more scatterlists in a page.
>
>Because of the size of the scatterlist structure. As pointers are bigger
>on 64-bit archs, the scatterlist structure ends up being bigger. The
>page size on x86-64 is 4kb, hence the number of structures you can fit
>in a page is smaller.

I take it this problem "goes away" on arches with 8KB page_size?


	Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/