[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070510213428.GX4163@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 23:34:28 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Piszcz <ap@...arrain.com>
Subject: Re: Chaining sg lists for big I/O commands: Question
On Thu, May 10 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On May 9 2007 15:38, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> I am a mdadm/disk/hard drive fanatic, I was curious:
> >>
> >> >On i386, we can at most fit 256 scatterlist elements into a page,
> >> >and on x86-64 we are stuck with 128. So that puts us somewhere
> >> >between 512kb and 1024kb for a single IO.
> >>
> >> How come 32bit is 256 and 64 is only 128?
> >>
> >> I am sure it is something very fundamental/simple but I was curious, I
> >> would think x86_64 would fit/support more scatterlists in a page.
> >
> >Because of the size of the scatterlist structure. As pointers are bigger
> >on 64-bit archs, the scatterlist structure ends up being bigger. The
> >page size on x86-64 is 4kb, hence the number of structures you can fit
> >in a page is smaller.
>
> I take it this problem "goes away" on arches with 8KB page_size?
Not really, the 8kb page size just doubles the sg size. On a 64-bit
arch, that would still only get you 1mb IO size.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists