| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 14:01:59 +0200 From: Christian <christiand59@....de> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...anurb.dk> Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v11 On Thursday 10 May 2007 22:05:00 Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Christian <christiand59@....de> wrote: > > > > Desktop performance without any manual renicing is excellent, even > > > > with make -j20. Gaming performance is at least on par with SD now! > > > > I've tried to > > > > > > Which games are you trying? and have you tried other workloads then > > > make -j20? > > > > > > try have a window with some 3d game open, and a browser besides it, > > > and press a link. i cant seem to get smooth results with CFS. > > [...] > > > I've tried many different workloads, kernel compile (normal -j4), > > extreme kernel compile (-j20) and Browsing/Open Office. GLXGears, > > Briquolo and enemy-territory work relly well under these loads. > > do you have CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled - while perhaps Kasper has it > disabled? Kasper, if so, could you try a quick test with CONFIG_PREEMPT > enabled, does that make any difference to your gaming-smoothness > results? [it's not a real solution, but this would help us narrow down > the smoothness problem you are seeing.] Yes, I have enabled full preemption and 1000 HZ. -Christian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists