[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070511043712.GB16944@in.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 10:07:12 +0530
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@...il.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@...l.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x86 setup rewrite tree ready for flamage^W review
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:15:21PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I believe the x86 setup tree is now finished. I will turn it into a
> "clean patchset" later this week, but I wanted to get flamed^W feedback
> on it first.
>
> The git tree is at:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/hpa/linux-2.6-newsetup.git;a=summary
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/hpa/linux-2.6-newsetup.git
> ...
>
> ... and a flat patch at ...
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/hpa/newsetup-36f021b5.patch
>
Wow, reading code in C is so much better than decoding assembly. :-)
Had a quick look, mainly from relocatable kernel code point of view. Yet
to dive deeper.
PHYSICAL_ALIGN needs to be 2MB on x86_64 instead of 1MB.
Thanks
Vivek
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists