[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0705121320240.9570@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 13:21:41 +0200 (MEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, David Chinner <dgc@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
xfs@....sgi.com, michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-git10/11: files getting truncated on xfs? or maybe an
nlink problem?
On May 10 2007 10:38, Matt Mackall wrote:
>>
>> for i in `seq 20`; do
>> hg clone -U --pull a b-$i
>> hg verify b-$i # always OK
>> umount /home
>> sleep 5
>> mount /home
>> hg verify b-$i # often found truncated files
>> done
>>
[...]
>
>This test looks like it should consist solely of open-for-append and
>write on about 20k files in the target directory. Because of the
>--pull, no hardlinks are involved. It shouldn't be all that different
>from doing tar cf - a | tar xf - b.
>
>The files get visited in alphabetical order, so the start of the
>corruption may be telling.
You should not assume alphabetical order. Filesystems may be free to
reorder things and return them (1) randomly like in a hash (2) by
creation time during readdir().
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists