linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.21-git10/11: files getting truncated on xfs? or maybe an nlink problem?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 12 May 2007 13:21:41 +0200 (MEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
cc:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, David Chinner <dgc@....com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	xfs@....sgi.com, michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-git10/11: files getting truncated on xfs? or maybe an
 nlink problem?


On May 10 2007 10:38, Matt Mackall wrote:
>> 
>>     for i in `seq 20`; do
>>     	hg clone -U --pull a b-$i
>>     	hg verify b-$i		# always OK
>>     	umount /home
>>     	sleep 5
>>     	mount /home
>>     	hg verify b-$i		# often found truncated files
>>     done
>>       
[...]
>
>This test looks like it should consist solely of open-for-append and
>write on about 20k files in the target directory. Because of the
>--pull, no hardlinks are involved. It shouldn't be all that different
>from doing tar cf - a | tar xf - b.
>
>The files get visited in alphabetical order, so the start of the
>corruption may be telling.

You should not assume alphabetical order. Filesystems may be free to
reorder things and return them (1) randomly like in a hash (2) by
creation time during readdir().


	Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/