[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070512124641.GZ11115@waste.org>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 07:46:41 -0500
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, David Chinner <dgc@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
xfs@....sgi.com, michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-git10/11: files getting truncated on xfs? or maybe an nlink problem?
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 01:21:41PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On May 10 2007 10:38, Matt Mackall wrote:
> >>
> >> for i in `seq 20`; do
> >> hg clone -U --pull a b-$i
> >> hg verify b-$i # always OK
> >> umount /home
> >> sleep 5
> >> mount /home
> >> hg verify b-$i # often found truncated files
> >> done
> >>
> [...]
> >
> >This test looks like it should consist solely of open-for-append and
> >write on about 20k files in the target directory. Because of the
> >--pull, no hardlinks are involved. It shouldn't be all that different
> >from doing tar cf - a | tar xf - b.
> >
> >The files get visited in alphabetical order, so the start of the
> >corruption may be telling.
>
> You should not assume alphabetical order. Filesystems may be free to
> reorder things and return them (1) randomly like in a hash (2) by
> creation time during readdir().
There is no assumption. Mercurial explicitly visits files in
alphabetical order for the above commands.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists