[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1178975427.22481.153.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 15:10:27 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Jordi Colomer <jco@....es>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix UCB1x00 driver to use sched_setscheduler
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 19:39 +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> Fix Touchscreen driver for UCB1x00-based touchscreens to use
> sched_setscheduler() instead of setting the fields of task_struct directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@...fujitsu.com>
>
> Index: linux-2.6.21-fix-ucb-drivers/drivers/mfd/ucb1x00-ts.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.21-fix-ucb-drivers.orig/drivers/mfd/ucb1x00-ts.c 2007-05-11 18:53:36.000000000 +0900
> +++ linux-2.6.21-fix-ucb-drivers/drivers/mfd/ucb1x00-ts.c 2007-05-11 19:33:20.000000000 +0900
> @@ -214,8 +214,9 @@ static int ucb1x00_thread(void *_ts)
> * We could run as a real-time thread. However, thus far
> * this doesn't seem to be necessary.
> */
> -// tsk->policy = SCHED_FIFO;
> -// tsk->rt_priority = 1;
> +// struct sched_param param = { .sched_priority = 1 };
> +//
> +// sched_setscheduler(tsk, SCHED_FIFO, ¶m);
Can we please remove the unused code completely instead of replacing it
by more commented out code ?
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists