linux-kernel - Re: [patch] ip_local_port_range sysctl has annoying default

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4645227F.3030905@zytor.com>
Date:	Fri, 11 May 2007 19:12:15 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Mark Glines <mark@...nes.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] ip_local_port_range sysctl has annoying default

Mark Glines wrote:
> 
> By a one-in-a-million coincidence, this machine has a default port
> range starting with 2048, and this breaks things for me.  I'm trying to
> run both klive and nfs on this box, but klive starts first (probably
> because of the filename sort order), and claims UDP port 2049 for its
> own purposes, causing the nfs server to fail to start.
> 
> If the bind hash size is over a certain threshold, the range
> 32768-61000 is used.  If it is under a certain threshold, a range
> like (1024|2048|3072)-4999 is used, depending on exactly how small it
> is.  Thix box happened to get the 2048-4999 range, which broke nfs.
> 
> A comment just above the code that does this says, "Try to be a bit
> smarter and adjust defaults depending on available memory."  "smarter"?
> Maybe, maybe not.  Either way, it's unexpected.
> 
> Following the principle of least astonishment, I think it seems better
> to use high, out-of-the-way port numbers regardless of how much RAM the
> system has.  So, the following patch changes this behavior slightly.
> The system still picks a dynamic range depending on the bind hash size,
> but now, all ranges start with 32768.  I suppose another reasonable way
> to do this would be to end all ranges with 61000, or something like
> that.
> 

Yes, that would be better.  The IANA recommended port range for dynamic
ports are 49152-65535; Linux extends this to 32768 and chops off some of
the really high ports, but keeping them in the high range is thus the
right thing to do.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/