[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <464570AC.5030108@garzik.org>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 03:45:48 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: jimmy bahuleyan <knight.camelot@...il.com>
CC: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Johannes Stezenbach <js@...uxtv.org>,
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Heikki Orsila <shdl@...alwe.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 3
jimmy bahuleyan wrote:
> i believe, the doc here is pretty unambiguous regarding the fact that
> volatile should be avoided. And as Stefan pointed out, anyone who feels
> the need to use, must surely _know_ what he is doing & hence is in a
> position t make that decision
Honestly, the above quoted paragraph states the situation better than
any long, complicated document.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists