[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705131222410.2271@anakin>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 12:28:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: undefined reference to `__clear_user' (was: Re: [patch 2/13]
signal/timer/event fds v10 - signalfd core ...)
Hi Davide,
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> --- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
> +++ linux-2.6.21-rc5.fds/fs/signalfd.c 2007-04-02 15:06:29.000000000 -0700
> +/*
> + * Copied from copy_siginfo_to_user() in kernel/signal.c
> + */
> +static int signalfd_copyinfo(struct signalfd_siginfo __user *uinfo,
> + siginfo_t const *kinfo)
> +{
> + long err;
> +
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct signalfd_siginfo) != 128);
> +
> + /*
> + * Unused memebers should be zero ...
> + */
> + err = __clear_user(uinfo, sizeof(*uinfo));
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Shouldn't this be `clear_user()'? I don't see any access_ok() calls
before this call (I do see them in copy_siginfo_to_user() in
kernel/signal.c), but of course I may miss something...
I only noticed because m68k doesn't have __clear_user(), as this routine
was never needed by generic code before your change.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists