[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1179181659.3703.99.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 17:27:39 -0500
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 15:00 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Well, let's get the build fix in place first and then we can feed
> > the cleanup in later on, in a more leisurely fashion?
> >
>
> If you like. Are all the Voyager users standing outside your office
> with pitchforks, demanding satisfaction?
That could be arranged ... The Xensource offices are just up the road
from Google, you know if I wanted to kill two birds with one stone.
Seriously, though, although I tolerate voyager breakage through the
merge window, I actively try to clean it up and have a working voyager
for the next release. There's no real excuse for not fixing build
breakage. How it's done, I don't really care. The only blocker for the
two patch smp consolidation + voyager fix was Andi ... if he's relaxing
that, then we can go that route.
Until this is fixed, there are going to be -rc testers firing off build
failure reports, which I think we'd all like to
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists