linux-kernel - Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 May 2007 15:29:05 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops

On Mon, 14 May 2007 23:58:09 +0200
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:

> 
> > OK, but only if you don't want to put "i386: move common parts of smp
> > into their own file" in front of it, and remove the duplicated code.  I
> > could send you a third copy if you like.
> 
> Using Jeremy's patch is better than James'
> 

This is getting comical.

According to my records, the patch
voyager-fix-build-broken-by-shift-to-smp_ops.patch _is_ Jeremy's patch. 
James forwarded it.

I take it from your statement that we should merge some Jeremy-patch other
than this Jeremy-patch?

If "yes", than could Jeremy please resend the other patch(es) (I believe there
are multiple patches involved) and then can James please test them?

If "no" then I think I'll just go shopping.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/