[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070514152905.3604fa20.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 15:29:05 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
On Mon, 14 May 2007 23:58:09 +0200
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:
>
> > OK, but only if you don't want to put "i386: move common parts of smp
> > into their own file" in front of it, and remove the duplicated code. I
> > could send you a third copy if you like.
>
> Using Jeremy's patch is better than James'
>
This is getting comical.
According to my records, the patch
voyager-fix-build-broken-by-shift-to-smp_ops.patch _is_ Jeremy's patch.
James forwarded it.
I take it from your statement that we should merge some Jeremy-patch other
than this Jeremy-patch?
If "yes", than could Jeremy please resend the other patch(es) (I believe there
are multiple patches involved) and then can James please test them?
If "no" then I think I'll just go shopping.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists