[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070515123721.1bfb02a3.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:37:21 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Peter Oruba" <peter.oruba@....com>
Cc: gregkh@...e.de, cramerj@...el.com, john.ronciak@...el.com,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com, rolandd@...co.com, halr@...taire.com,
linux-driver@...gic.com,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Stephen Hemminger" <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] PCI-X/PCI-Express read control interfaces
On Tue, 15 May 2007 13:50:27 +0200
"Peter Oruba" <peter.oruba@....com> wrote:
> This patch set introduces a PCI-X / PCI-Express read byte count control
> interface. Instead of letting every driver to directly read/write to PCI
> config space for that, an interface is provided. The interface functions then
> can be used for quirks since some PCI bridges require that read byte count
> values are set by the BIOS and left unchanged by device drivers.
Some of the patches were wordwrapped, which I fixed.
The way we would merge a feature like this is
- get maintainers to review-and-ack the change
- merge the core patch into Greg's PCI tree and later into
mainline.
- Once the base infrastructure is in mainline, feed the per-driver
changes into the tree via the appropriate maintainers.
This takes, umm, months and consumes quite a bit of my time. I'm becoming
inclined just to slam stuff like this straight in as you've proposed, but
for now, let's play the game - I split the patches up appropriately. I
don't think there's any particular urgency behind this, is there?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists