linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ubi: kill homegrown endian macros

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 May 2007 16:56:53 +0200
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...radead.org>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, akpm@...l.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubi: kill homegrown endian macros

On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 05:50:43PM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> Christoph,
> 
> On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 16:32 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Kill ubis homegrown endianess handling crap and replace it with
> > the normal kernel endianess handling.
> 
> Err,__be32 and the company are just sparse things, while I have compiler
> checks with my struct ubi32_t and friends. JFFS2 also uses the same
> technique. Why do you force me to rely on sparse instead instead of
> compiler?

Yes.  Like all other code in the kernel aswell.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/