[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <97d47c2261fe9cd3f1a6c864278a6ab6@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 22:53:49 +0200
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rt2] PowerPC: decrementer clockevent driver
>>> Otherwise, when the contents of DEC0 change, the exception effects
>>> of the Decrementer become consistent with the new contents of the
>>> Decrementer reasonably soon after the change.
>
>> And that is guaranteed on all PowerPC as far as I can see.
>> The main thing is that a decrementer exception won't go
>> away until the high bit becomes 0.
>
> On both POWER4 and POWER4+, the Decrementer must be implemented such
> that requirements 1 to 3 below are satisfied. On POWER4, requirements
> 4 and 5 must also be satisfied.
<snip>
> 4. Whenever bit 0 of the Decrementer changes from 0 to 1, an interrupt
> request is signaled. If multiple Decrementer interrupt requests are
> received before the first can be reported, only one interrupt is
> reported. The occurrence of a Decrementer interrupt cancels the
> request.
>
> 5. If the Decrementer is altered by software and the contents of bit 0
> are changed from 0 to 1, an interrupt request is signaled.
From the POWER ISA 2.03, the latest public version of the
architecture definition:
When the contents of DEC32 change from 0 to 1, a Decrementer
exception will come into existence within a reasonable period
or time. When the contents of DEC32 change from 1 to 0, an
existing Decrementer exception will cease to exist within a
reasonable period of time, but not later than the completion
of the next context synchronizing instruction or event.
> (4) clearly contradicts your point.
Yes, on some implementations there can be other conditions that
make a decrementer exception go away; there is no contradiction
here (thankfully). My wording was sloppy.
> I don't mind changing #ifdef though (so it'll cover all non Book E
> cases)
That was exactly my point; thank you.
Segher
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists