[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1179464690.32247.370.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 15:04:49 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rt2] PowerPC: decrementer clockevent driver
>
> Yes, on some implementations there can be other conditions that
> make a decrementer exception go away; there is no contradiction
> here (thankfully). My wording was sloppy.
Some CPUs have the DEC exceptions basically edge triggered (yeah I know
it sucks). That's why, among others, the IRQ soft-disable code has code
to re-trigger DEC exceptions ASAP (by setting it to 1.. note that we
could probably use 0 here, we've been a bit conservative).
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists