[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1179466769.3658.0.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 13:39:29 +0800
From: Dave Liu <r63238@...escale.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rt2] PowerPC: decrementer clockevent driver
> > Yes, on some implementations there can be other conditions that
> > make a decrementer exception go away; there is no contradiction
> > here (thankfully). My wording was sloppy.
>
> Some CPUs have the DEC exceptions basically edge triggered (yeah I know
for example?
> it sucks). That's why, among others, the IRQ soft-disable code has code
> to re-trigger DEC exceptions ASAP (by setting it to 1.. note that we
> could probably use 0 here, we've been a bit conservative).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists