[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D458F595-921F-4FC0-88FC-38EEF1DCC920@mac.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 21:00:44 -0400
From: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>
To: Jörn Engel <joern@...ybastard.org>
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
LKML Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, Albert Cahalan <acahalan@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@...eria.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three
On May 17, 2007, at 13:45:33, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 07:26:07PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt
> (jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de) wrote:
>>> My plan was to move this code to lib/ sooner or later. If you
>>> consider it useful in its current state, I can do it immediatly.
>>> And if someone else merged a superior btree library I'd happily
>>> remove mine and use the new one instead.
>>>
>>> Opinions?
>>
>> Why would we need another btree, when there is lib/rbtree.c? Or
>> does yours do something fundamentally different?
>
> It is not red-black tree, it is b+ tree.
It might be better to use the prefix "bptree" to help prevent
confusion. A quick google search on "bp-tree" reveals only the perl B
+-tree module "Tree::BPTree", a U-Maryland Java CS project on B+-
trees, and a news article about a "BP tree-top protest".
Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists