lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 18 May 2007 08:16:25 +0200 (MEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <>
To:	Kyle Moffett <>
cc:	Jörn Engel <>,
	Evgeniy Polyakov <>,
	Andrew Morton <>,,
	LKML Kernel <>,, Albert Cahalan <>,
	Thomas Gleixner <>,
	Pekka Enberg <>,
	Greg KH <>, Ingo Oeser <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three

On May 17 2007 21:00, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>> > > Opinions?
>> > 
>> > Why would we need another btree, when there is lib/rbtree.c?  Or does
>> > yours do something fundamentally different?
>> It is not red-black tree, it is b+ tree.
> It might be better to use the prefix "bptree" to help prevent confusion.  A
> quick google search on "bp-tree" reveals only the perl B+-tree module
> "Tree::BPTree", a U-Maryland Java CS project on B+-trees, and a news article
> about a "BP tree-top protest".

BP heh.. How about "struct bplustree"?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists