linux-kernel - Re: aio is unlikely

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <464E168E.4000403@garzik.org>
Date:	Fri, 18 May 2007 17:11:42 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Alex Volkov <avcp-lkmail@....net>,
	'Linux Kernel Mailing List' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: aio is unlikely

Andrew Morton wrote:
> Yes, if you agree with Jeff's original point.
> 
> But I don't, actually.  Sure, on some machines+workloads, AIO is more
> common than sync IO.  But I expect that when we sum across all the
> machines+workloads in the world, sync IO is more common and is hence the
> case we should optimise for.
> 
> That's assuming that the unlikely() actually does something.


For the record, I agreed with your counter-point, and retract[ed?] my 
disagreement...

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/