[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705181931180.7794@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 19:32:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
cc: Linda Walsh <lkml@...nx.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: building i386 requires s390: "driver/crypto/Kconfig" sourcing
s390 arch
On Fri, 18 May 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Fri, 18 May 2007 14:46:02 -0700 Linda Walsh wrote:
> > If the standard that other architectures are using is to put their
> > devices in the crypto directory, then one might expect all crypto
> > devices to be there. Why should s390 stick out and put its crypto
> > device someplace under the s390 tree, forcing parts of the s390
> > tree to be included when building other architectures?
>
> drivers/crypto/ currently contains drivers for x86_32 and s390 (the
> latter by indirection, which is what is causing you this
> grief/problem/whatever), but it certainly looks like it could be a
> home for crypto drivers on any arch.
this all sounds vaguely familiar. oh, wait ...
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/28/212
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists