[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <464E3FBD.7090704@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 17:07:25 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
CC: Linda Walsh <lkml@...nx.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: building i386 requires s390: "driver/crypto/Kconfig" sourcing
s390 arch
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Fri, 18 May 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 18 May 2007 14:46:02 -0700 Linda Walsh wrote:
>
>>> If the standard that other architectures are using is to put their
>>> devices in the crypto directory, then one might expect all crypto
>>> devices to be there. Why should s390 stick out and put its crypto
>>> device someplace under the s390 tree, forcing parts of the s390
>>> tree to be included when building other architectures?
>> drivers/crypto/ currently contains drivers for x86_32 and s390 (the
>> latter by indirection, which is what is causing you this
>> grief/problem/whatever), but it certainly looks like it could be a
>> home for crypto drivers on any arch.
>
> this all sounds vaguely familiar. oh, wait ...
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/28/212
I just tried several things to "fix" it, but none of them worked.
I wouldn't mind making missing files in *config be non-fatal, i.e.,
just print a warning message, but I doubt that the maintainer(s)
would accept that.
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists