[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <51b3a75638604c9dd7ed60a10f0ed934@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 01:49:59 +0200
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
Dave Liu <r63238@...escale.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rt2] PowerPC: decrementer clockevent driver
> I find it extremely silly to implement it as edge anyway. The EE line
> is
> level triggered, and having a mix of edge and level on the same
> exception without a clean way to retrigger the DEC one other than
> waiting one tick is just causing trouble.
It isn't edge triggered, it just automatically clears the
decrementer exception condition at its source when taken
(on certain implementations -- others leave it to software
to clear it).
Segher
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists