[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070519081944.3caf4776.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 08:19:44 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Fengguang Wu <wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
Steven Pratt <slpratt@...tin.ibm.com>,
Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] readahead: introduce PG_readahead
On Sat, 19 May 2007 13:35:01 +0200 Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> > We have the advantage that if the kernel very occasionally gets the wrong
> > result for PageReadahead(page), nothing particularly bad will happen, so we
> > can do racy things.
>
> On 64bit there is no particular shortage of page flags.
I think pretty much all of the upper 32 bits got used for ia64 fields,
but it's never been very clear how many were actually used or needed.
> If you ever do racy things please do them 32bit only.
hrm. It *really* won't matter if we make one suboptimal readahead decision
every second day. And there's value in having the same behaviour on all
architectures.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists