[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070519123031.GA6095@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 20:30:31 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
Steven Pratt <slpratt@...tin.ibm.com>,
Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] readahead: introduce PG_readahead
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 11:28:24PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2007 06:47:53 +0800 Fengguang Wu <wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn> wrote:
>
> > Introduce a new page flag: PG_readahead.
>
> Is there any way in which we can avoid adding a new page flag?
>
> We have the advantage that if the kernel very occasionally gets the wrong
> result for PageReadahead(page), nothing particularly bad will happen, so we
> can do racy things.
>
> >From a quick peek, it appears that PG_readahead is only ever set against
> non-uptodate pages. If true we could perhaps exploit that: say,
> PageReadahead(page) == PG_referenced && !PG_uptodate?
PG_uptodate will flip to 1 before the reader touches the page :(
However, it may be possible to share the same bit with PG_reclaim or PG_booked.
Which one would be preferred?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists