[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2c0942db0705200822j685ec3b2x399a080622b6fc05@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 08:22:07 -0700
From: "Ray Lee" <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>
To: "Al Viro" <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: "Andrey Borzenkov" <arvidjaar@...l.ru>,
"Uwe Bugla" <uwe.bugla@....de>, "Ken Chen" <kenchen@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>
Subject: Re: bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image
On 5/19/07, Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 11:16:59PM -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
> > Ken? Ball's in your court. As the patch isn't providing a killer
> > feature for 2.6.22, I'd suggest just reverting it for now until the
> > issues are ironed out.
>
> Hold it. The real question here is which logics do we want there.
> IOW, and how many device nodes do we want to appear and _when_ do
> we want them to appear?
The when part is what looks to make it racy. I'm guessing that we're
relying on udev to create those loop nodes. If so, I think any scheme
that creates more on demand would give transient mount errors while
it's waiting on udev to create more nodes.
Perhaps if we were to start with 8 loop nodes at init (as we have in
2.6.21), and then always maintain a margin of 8 (or 4, or...) when
they start being used or detached?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists