linux-kernel - Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 20 May 2007 10:19:33 -0700
From:	"Ray Lee" <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>
To:	"Miguel Figueiredo" <elmig@...ianpt.org>
Cc:	"Bill Davidsen" <davidsen@....com>,
	"Linux Kernel M/L" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48

On 5/20/07, Miguel Figueiredo <elmig@...ianpt.org> wrote:
> > It doesn't look like you were running his glitch1 script which starts
> > several in glxgears parallel. Were you, or were you just running one?
>
> No i'm not, i'm running only one instance of glxgears inside the GNOME's
> environment.

Then not only were you on different hardware, but you weren't even
running the same test he was! He wasn't reporting raw numbers for one
glxgears, he was running several in parallel.

Whether your test is valid is a different question. Regardless, it's
not the same test he was doing, and so your results have no bearing on
his. You may wish to reread his message from the start of the thread,
and find the glitch1 script he was using to perform the test. He's
sent it to the list before as an attachment.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/