linux-kernel - Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4651E4A8.7010009@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 May 2007 19:27:52 +0100
From:	Matt Keenan <tank.en.mate@...il.com>
To:	Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
CC:	Ray Lee <ray@...rabbit.org>,
	Linux Kernel M/L <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48

Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Ray Lee wrote:
>> On 5/19/07, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com> wrote:
>>> I generated a table of results from the latest glitch1 script, using an
>>> HTML postprocessor I not *quite* ready to foist on the word. In any 
>>> case
>>> it has some numbers for frames per second, fairness of the processor
>>> time allocated to the compute bound processes which generate a lot of
>>> other screen activity for X, and my subjective comments on how 
>>> smooth it
>>> looked and felt.
>>>
>>> The chart is at http://www.tmr.com/~davidsen/sched_smooth_01.html for
>>> your viewing pleasure.
>>
>> Is the S.D. columns (immediately after the average) standard
>> deviation? If so, you may want to rename those 'stdev', as it's a
>> little confusing to have S.D. stand for that and Staircase Deadline.
>> Further, which standard deviation is it? (The standard deviation of
>> the values (stdev), or the standard deviation of the mean (sdom)?)
>>
> What's intended is the stddev from the average, and perl bit me on 
> that one. If you spell a variable wrong the same way more than once it 
> doesn't flag it as a possible spelling error.
>
> Note on the math, even when coded as intended, the divide of the 
> squares of the errors is by N-1 not N. I found it both ways in online 
> doc, but I learned it decades ago as "N-1" so I used that.
N-1 is for estimating the standard deviation from a random sample of a 
population (s), N is for calculating the standard deviation of a whole 
population (σ).

xref http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_deviation

Yes, I am aware of the potential for Wikipedia articles to be wrong, but 
this article seems correct at first blush :)

Matt


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/