linux-kernel - Re: second, bigger problem with private futexes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4651E44A.9070301@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 May 2007 11:26:18 -0700
From:	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
CC:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: second, bigger problem with private futexes

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Do you mean POSIX allowed to mix PROCESS_PRIVATE and PROCESS_SHARED
> condvar and mutexes ? Seems silly to me :(

Don't judge what you don't understand.  If all waiters are always in one
process but the notifiers can be in different processes, this setup
might make a lot of sense.

- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGUeRK2ijCOnn/RHQRAqRuAKCpc7cmhsnwfclz1DU81RNXRjm68ACgosZc
RqWca4r+Ya54dp5zNztkYuk=
=sW/1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/