[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070520031550.GA22903@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 13:15:50 +1000
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
michal@...ix.cz, ioe-lkml@...eria.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH (v2)] crypto: Remove pointless padlock module
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 08:28:17PM +0100, Simon Arlott wrote:
>
> It should be a bool that doesn't select anything, the AES and SHA modules
> will select CRYPTO_ALGAPI. It could also depend on MVIAC3_2 || MVIA_C7
> instead of X86_32.
Having it as a tristate means that we don't have to duplicate the
dependencies and selects that each padlock algorithm would otherwise
do. So is there actually a problem with it being a tristate?
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists