lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0705211036q1162e9edvd73af8d6c536e565@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 May 2007 12:36:10 -0500
From:	"Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To:	"Robin Getz" <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org>
Cc:	"Bryan Wu" <bryan.wu@...log.com>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/32] Blackfin update for 2.6.22-rc2

On 5/21/07, Robin Getz <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org> wrote:
> since there is noMMU, are we better:
>  - putting stubs (return ENOSYS - give runtime errors), or
>  - just ignore the errors - and give compile errors? (Is there any way to put
> something into the syscall table, as not to get the warnings?)

there are no compile errors ... having a stub that returns -ENOSYS is
the same thing as not having a stub as the fallback code when given an
unknown syscall # will return -ENOSYS ...
-mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ