[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46521165.5030207@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 23:38:45 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>, Chuck@...a.kernel.org,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>, stable@...nel.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [stable] [patch 00/69] -stable review
Chris Wright a écrit :
> * Andrew Morton (akpm@...ux-foundation.org) wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 May 2007 12:16:12 -0700
>> Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org> wrote:
>>
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.21.2 release.
>> Gee a lot of these are fixing recently-added regressions :(
>>
>> Did we fix oprofile on x86_64 yet? If not, I'd suggest we should
>> hold off 2.6.21.2 until we have done so.
>
> No, we've seen 2 versions of the patch, no word from Andi, and nothing
> upstream that I saw. Andi?
>
Seems Linus tree includes a fix from Andi, check commit
6c977aad03a18019015035958c65b6729cd0574c
Probably good enough for 2.6.21.2 ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists