[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070521222004.GT6291@stusta.de>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 00:20:04 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:31:48PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 21 May 2007 12:16:12 -0700
> Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org> wrote:
>
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.21.2 release.
>
> Gee a lot of these are fixing recently-added regressions :(
>...
If only it would fix all of them...
Michal's list [1] currently contains 51 different regressions in
2.6.21 compared to 2.6.20 (12 of them were already reported before
2.6.21 was released).
cu
Adrian
[1] http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions [2]
[2] the 2.6.21 regressions are listed after the 28 known 2.6.22-rc
regressions
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists