[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46521BFD.7040703@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 18:23:57 -0400
From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:31:48PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 May 2007 12:16:12 -0700
>> Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org> wrote:
>>
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.21.2 release.
>> Gee a lot of these are fixing recently-added regressions :(
>> ...
>
> If only it would fix all of them...
>
> Michal's list [1] currently contains 51 different regressions in
> 2.6.21 compared to 2.6.20 (12 of them were already reported before
> 2.6.21 was released).
Yeah, 2.6.21 seems awfully buggy, and patches to fix many of the bugs
haven't appeared.
Another 2.6.20 update seems to be in order...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists