linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] add "notime" boot option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070523100416.93835196.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 May 2007 10:04:16 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add "notime" boot option

On Wed, 23 May 2007 15:03:01 +0400 Michael Tokarev wrote:

> Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > 
> > Add "notime" boot option to prevent timing data from being printed on
> > each printk message line.
> 
> That's a good source of confusion.  To me, "notime" means something
> like "don't bother calculating time", instead of the proposed
> behavior.  Can't it be something like 'nologts' (no log timestamps)
> or nots or notimestamps or nologtime instead?

"nologtime" is OK with me.  or does it confuse people in a
different way?  Anyone else?

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/