[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <465492C8.9060003@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 21:15:20 +0200
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
CC: Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add "notime" boot option
On 05/23/2007 07:04 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> That's a good source of confusion. To me, "notime" means something
>> like "don't bother calculating time", instead of the proposed
>> behavior. Can't it be something like 'nologts' (no log timestamps)
>> or nots or notimestamps or nologtime instead?
>
> "nologtime" is OK with me. or does it confuse people in a
> different way? Anyone else?
The CONFIG option is called CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME. How about "noprintktime"? At
least nicely to the point...
Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists