linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH]: UDF code style conversion to kernel style

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 24 May 2007 21:47:42 +0300
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Cyrill Gorcunov" <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc:	"Jan Kara" <jack@...e.cz>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org>,
	"Ben Fennema" <bfennema@...con.csc.calpoly.edu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: UDF code style conversion to kernel style

Hi Cyrill,

On 5/23/07, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:
> @@ -2103,7 +1944,7 @@ long udf_block_map(struct inode *inode, sector_t block)
>  	kernel_lb_addr eloc;
>  	uint32_t elen;
>  	sector_t offset;
> -	struct extent_position epos = { NULL, 0, { 0, 0}};
> +	struct extent_position epos = {};

Bits like these in the middle of indentation fixes makes me feel
uneasy. Could we simply ask Andrew to run Lindent on the UDF sources
at some convinient point and push those to Linus like we did with
mm/slab.c if I recall correctly? Its safer to do cleanups like these
after that.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/