[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070525080209.GE8094@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 10:02:09 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86_64: fix sched_clock()
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 09:54:46AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Subject: [patch] x86_64: fix sched_clock()
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
>
> sched_clock() is totally broken on x86_64, because it is not defined by
> the architecture at all! It fell the victim to the opaqueness of
> __attribute__((weak)) and to non-testing.
More non retesting.
>
> the i386 version was supposed to be used. This patch fixes that. Booted
> and tested on x86_64 and i386.
Hmm indeed. I actually had it correct at some point (i remember
fixing 64bit compile errors in sched-clock ;-). I guess the Makefile hunk
accidentially dropped out during some later merging and this didn't get
noticed due to the weak attribute.
That also explains the issue reported by Peter earlier I guess.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists