[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070525080827.GA22399@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 10:08:27 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: [patch] i386, numaq: enable TSCs again
Andi, Andrew, do you remember why we disabled TSCs on NUMAQ? It was
slightly async between CPUs, right? In that case we should try the patch
below.
Ingo
--------------------->
Subject: [patch] i386, numaq: enable TSCs again
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
enable TSCs on NUMAQ again. sched_clock() got improved and
the scheduler treats it as a per-CPU clock, so there should
be no issues from the slightly async TSCs on NUMAQ. Please
holler if this is wrong ...
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
arch/i386/kernel/numaq.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-cfs-2.6.22-rc2-mm1.q/arch/i386/kernel/numaq.c
===================================================================
--- linux-cfs-2.6.22-rc2-mm1.q.orig/arch/i386/kernel/numaq.c
+++ linux-cfs-2.6.22-rc2-mm1.q/arch/i386/kernel/numaq.c
@@ -81,8 +81,7 @@ int __init get_memcfg_numaq(void)
static int __init numaq_tsc_disable(void)
{
if (num_online_nodes() > 1) {
- printk(KERN_DEBUG "NUMAQ: disabling TSC\n");
- tsc_disable = 1;
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG "NUMAQ: NOT disabling TSC. System still ok?\n");
}
return 0;
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists