linux-kernel - Re: [patch] x86_64: fix sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070525080415.GB21446@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 25 May 2007 10:04:15 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86_64: fix sched_clock()


* Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:

> > the i386 version was supposed to be used. This patch fixes that. 
> > Booted and tested on x86_64 and i386.
> 
> Hmm indeed. I actually had it correct at some point (i remember fixing 
> 64bit compile errors in sched-clock ;-). I guess the Makefile hunk 
> accidentially dropped out during some later merging and this didn't 
> get noticed due to the weak attribute.

well the tsc.h bit was needed too.

> That also explains the issue reported by Peter earlier I guess.

yes, it does, at least on my box.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/