[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070525084109.GI8094@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 10:41:09 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86_64: fix sched_clock()
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 10:34:31AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>
> > > > Hmm indeed. I actually had it correct at some point (i remember
> > > > fixing 64bit compile errors in sched-clock ;-). I guess the
> > > > Makefile hunk accidentially dropped out during some later merging
> > > > and this didn't get noticed due to the weak attribute.
> > >
> > > well the tsc.h bit was needed too.
> >
> > It's not in defconfig at least. I just tried it.
>
> what do you mean? The tsc.h bit is needed because
Means i readded the Makefile hunk and it compiled for me in 64bit without
changing anything else.
> arch/i386/kernel/sched-clock.c (now built on x86_64 too with the patch i
> sent) uses the tsc_disable global flag which is non-existent on x86_64.
> So my tsc.h change adds that global flag, always-defined to 0.
My version of sched_clock.c doesn't have any reference to tsc_disable.
-andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists