linux-kernel - Re: [patch] sched_clock(): cleanups, #2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070525120228.GA7186@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 25 May 2007 14:02:28 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [patch] sched_clock(): cleanups, #2


* Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:

> > find below the cleanups from my first patch that didnt make it into 
> > your cleanups. (plus one more cleanup i noticed while merging the 
> > missing bits from my first patch) Goes after the bugfix i just sent. 
> > Please apply.
> 
> I cannot apply it as is because it changes code from the paravirtops 
> patch too.

ok - then please merge that single hunk into the paravirtops patch - and 
leave the other 6 hunks in this patch.

> BTW to nitpick the original formattings you changed are all probably 
> standard code style and the new comment is a classical i++; /* 
> Increase i */

could you please quote the portion from my patch that you are talking 
about?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/