[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a781481a0705250537o768c609evaf32d517444f7aca@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 18:07:55 +0530
From: "Satyam Sharma" <satyam.sharma@...il.com>
To: "Richard Purdie" <richard@...nedhand.com>
Cc: "Nitin Gupta" <nitingupta910@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm-cc@...top.org,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Andrey Panin" <pazke@...pac.ru>, "Bret Towe" <magnade@...il.com>,
"Michael-Luke Jones" <mlj28@....ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 4
Hi Richard,
On 5/25/07, Richard Purdie <richard@...nedhand.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 17:15 +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> > Richard, can you please provide perf. results for this patch also?
> > Also, can you please mail back latest version of your LZO patch? In
> > meantime, I will try to include benchmarking support to the
> > 'compress-test' module.
>
> This version is 15% slower at decompression and about equal on
> compression.
I hope you tested your _safe variant against this, Nitin has done away
with the _unsafe version in this patch. Also, are you using your crypto
lzo-support + tcrypt changes ( http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/1/303 ) to
benchmark these?
> I am however still strongly of the opinion that we should just use the
> version in -mm (which is my latest version).
Right, if the difference is anything >10%, code cleanup does lose
its attractiveness.
Satyam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists